Objective
2. To develop a responsive and accountable attitude among the stakeholders to maintain harmonious educational environment in the institution.
3. To inform the learners to express their grievances, if any, freely and frank, without any fear of being victimized.
4. To provide the learners sense of participation in problem solving.
5. To create awareness of availability of members for students and faculties to report grievances.
6. To investigate the cause of grievances.
7. To ensure effectual solution depending upon the gravity of the grievance.
Composition
Dr. Dilip Patil
Dr. S. D. Koshti
Dr. M. B. Patil
Dr.(Ms.) D. P. Sawant
Mr. N. N. Varade
Activity
Achievements / Report
STUDENTS GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL CELL- 2019-2020
Introduction-
As per the rules and regulations
addressed by the AICTE / UGC / SPPU, for student or other stake holders in a
Technical Institution, “Grievance Redressal Committee” of NKTT College of
Commerce Thane to enquire the nature , extent of grievance and to redress the
same.
Composition of the Committee-
·
Prin. Dr. D. M. Patil –
Chairperson
Members-
1.
Dr. S. D. Koshti- Member
2.
Dr. D. P. Sawant-
3.
Dr. M. B. Patil-
4.
Mr. N. N. Varade
Grievance Redressal Mechanism:
1.
The
Cell will entertain both, written and signed complaints as well as complaints
received through
e-mails [----]
addressed to the Institution.
2.
Stakeholder having grievance, may approach
Grievance Cell for guidance, if need be.
3.
The
written complaints, received through proper channel, are to be entertained submitted
to the Cell.
4.
The Cell shall fix date for hearing
the complaint.
5.
The
Cell will submit its recommendations, if any, to the concerned Authority for a
suitable action or a possible redressal.
6.
Results of the meeting to be
communicated to the student and can be accessed on the portal.
7. Student Grievance Redressal Cell Portal available on web site
-------
§ Report:
1. The Chairperson briefed about overall
view regarding the role of the Grievance Cell.
2. All the complaints record has to be
kept by the Institution
3. Constructive suggestions were
invited regarding the functioning of the Grievance Committee.
4. There was no case of grievance
during the academic year.